|
The
Revenue said: “The current position on VAT registration
application processing is a major concern for agents and
HMRC [the Revenue] shares those concerns and is working
hard, at the highest levels, to address them.”
It
was missing its target of processing low-risk VAT
registrations in 14 days “in most cases”. It shared
concerns about the delays experienced this year in
answering post, which it expected to be rectified by the
end of the year.
Frank
Haskew, of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in
England and Wales, said: “The picture is not a
particularly edifying one. One senses they have rather
lost control. That is very serious.”
“We
are hearing stories that tax offices are still opening
letters from two or three months ago. Our members and
their clients are at the end of their tether.”
Although
the Revenue was putting considerable effort into tackling
the problems, the current squeeze on its budget would make
it harder to improve its service, he said.
The
Revenue said one reason for the delays was the need for
more intense scrutiny of applications to combat “missing
trader” fraud, a scam that relies on obtaining a VAT
number. Missing trader fraud robbed the exchequer of £2bn-£3bn
in 2005-06, although the Treasury said this week its
operational measures had resulted in a drop in attempted
fraud of up to £1.5bn in 2006-07.
It
promised to target its pre-registration checks – which
last year weeded out more than 7,000 applications – more
effectively and reduce the number of queries that were
referred back to businesses before their applications
could be processed.
The
“drop in service standards” was also blamed on a jump
in company formations after this year’s Budget, as a
result of a change in policy on managed service companies
that encouraged workers to set up companies. IT problems
and the consolidation of its VAT registration work into
only two sites were factors.
It
expected a turnround in performance later this autumn, but
warned that the lead time in implementing changes,
including training new staff, meant it would “take time
to see the improvement flowing through”.
The
delays in answering queries largely stem from problems
introducing “lean” management techniques. The Revenue
said: “Some offices have adapted to the new ways of
working better than others.” But it was confident the
new system would result in improvements when it was truly
embedded.
Its
goal was to ensure that all customers received a
consistent service on a “first in/first out” basis –
rather than some having to wait much longer than others
for a response to their inquiry.
Source
: Financial Times - London, England, UK, dated
12/10/2007
|