|
Belgian
court to rule on Loughney Vat fraud case
A
judgment is due in a Belgian court case arising from
allegations that Irish businessman Kevin Loughney - a
co-founder of the Kitty O’Shea pub chain - gave gifts
to a Vat officer to avoid paying €300,000 in tax.
Final documents were exchanged before the court last
Thursday, and a judgment is expected within one month.
Loughney, who is originally from Mayo, is facing the
threat of a two-year suspended prison sentence,
following allegations concerning tax returns for Kitty
O’Shea’s pub in Brussels.
|
|
|
The
Belgian prosecutor is also bringing charges against the
Vat officer dealing with the returns. The officer, Pascal
Wulf, could be facing two years in prison for alleged
‘‘passive corruption’’ if he is found guilty. Both
Loughney and Wulf deny the charges.
The
first international Kitty O’Shea’s pub was established
in Paris in 1986, and the chain grew to nine pubs,
including several US outlets and one at the Grand Canal
Hotel in Dublin.
Kevin Loughney and his brother Brian owned the chain. Only
three outlets still operate. They include the Brussels
pub, which is based near the so-called ‘EU quarter’ in
the city and is under new management.
Ten days ago, the Belgian criminal circuit court heard
allegations that Wulf, who oversaw Vat collection in
Brussels city centre, did not collect the €300,000 Vat
debt owed by Kitty O’Shea’s.
The court heard that no tax return had been filed for the
business for the preceding three years and, as a result,
it was issued with a bill including interest and
penalties, which amounted to €300,000.
It was alleged that Wulf appeared to classify the company
as bankrupt on the Vat office’s computer database, and
that he advised Loughney to declare the company bankrupt.
In exchange for this, it was alleged, the tax officer
appeared to have received several perks, including airline
tickets for a trip to Ireland. Loughney was not in court,
but was represented by a solicitor.
The court heard that, because Wulf was the only
English-speaking official in the Vat office, he dealt with
Loughney. It was alleged he had meals and drinks at the
pub and that a cordial relationship developed between the
pair.
In the case of the airline tickets, the court heard Wulf
planned to travel to Ireland with his wife, and that
Loughney offered him an attractive price of €210 for the
tickets, because of a frequent flyer discount.
Wulf told the court that Kitty O’Shea’s had been a
successful business until 2002, when it ran into
difficulties because of works at the nearby Berlaymont
building, which reduced customer numbers and created
financial difficulties.
He also claimed that the Belgian manager of the
establishment ‘‘made off with the cash register
takings’’.
Wulf said that Loughney began to take over the management
of the business in 2002, and wanted to bring the Vat debt
down to €30,000.Wulf alleged that Loughney presented a
payment schedule and offered a personal guarantee on it to
the tax office.
He said that, as the Vat office was understaffed and he
was the only English speaker there, he dealt with the case
himself. Wulf’s defence lawyer, Paul Tavernier, said
that no offence had been committed.
He said his client was planning to travel to Ireland and
that Loughney provided him with airline tickets at an
attractive price.
But those tickets, for €210, were never used and the
trip did not take place, according to the defence.
Loughney described the charges as ‘‘outrageous’’
and said that no one would ‘‘drag his name through the
muck’’.
Source
: Sunday Business Post - Dublin, Ireland dated
17/02/2008
|