|
Competing
Taxes
Works
contracts can straddle three taxable activities as per
the current law. There is of course supply of goods.
Then, due to the very nature of the contract, there is
supply of services. Further, if in the process of
completing the works contract a new commodity comes into
existence, there is the taxable event of manufacture.
As
of now, the supply of goods is taxable in the form of
Value Added Tax (VAT), while the services element is
taxable as service tax. If a new commodity comes into
existence, in the process of executing a works contract,
then, at least in theory, Central Excise duty may be
levied. Hence, different aspects of the same activity
have a potential to be taxed by different statutes.
Legislative,
judicial background
In
law, this is covered by the doctrine of aspects.
However, there have been differing views of the Supreme
Court and the High Courts on the applicability of this
theory. The final word of the apex court on this, in the
BSNL and Others vs Union of India (SC 2006) case, was
that the aspects doctrine pertains to legislative
competence and not the application of taxation on the
same components of a transaction.
A
constitutional amendment in 1983 enabled the States to
tax, among others, transactions involving works
contracts.
Present
Status
At
present, State VAT laws have specific provisions for
taxing works contracts. To avoid taxing the services
element, these laws and associated rules provide for
either separation of labour and materials or percentage
deductions in transaction value.
A
third method is of prescription of a lower rate of tax
in a composition/lumpsum scheme for works contracts. The
Central statute of service tax has also provided for
similar treatment to avoid taxation of sale of goods as
part of a works contract.
As
far as Central Excise is concerned, the law seeks to
preclude the applicability of service tax wherever the
activity amounts to manufacture. In case the works
contract leads to an immoveable property coming into
existence, the operation of Central Excise levy anyway
is out of question, as it is only goods which can be
taxed.
The
actual picture on the ground is however not as clear.
Disputes on taxability and taxable value for the three
competing taxes still refuse to fade away.
Opportunity
in GST
Taxes
on works contracts assume significance for the real
estate/construction industry and those engaged in
erection, commissioning and installation of plant and
machinery. In these activities, apart from taxability,
the concepts of right to use, credit of capital goods,
and usage of consumables also come into play giving rise
to various tax consequences.
With
the probable introduction of GST in India, it is
expected that simplification and consolidation of taxes
would lead to multitude of case laws and legislative
history on works contracts becoming irrelevant.
The
overarching concept in a GST is one of supply which
subsumes the concepts of sale of goods, provision of
services and manufacture. If States and the Central
Government share the powers of taxing services and
goods, the separation instituted between provision of
services and sale of goods, for segregation of taxing
powers, will become redundant.
The
elaborate schema of deductions and credits for taxing
works contracts may slide into history. This of course
is based on the premise that GST will have a simple
structure and goods as well as services will be taxed on
a uniform rate. Multiplicity of rates in goods or
services in GST may lead us to retread the path of
componentising works contracts for the purpose of tax
which, in turn, will lead to complexity of
interpretation as well as implementation.
What
lies in store for works contracts in the GST regime is
hence awaited with interest.
So urce
: The HinduBusinessLine, India, dated 21/03/2009
|