Welcome

 

Taxing the power consumer of India

Given the growth being witnessed by the economy and the need for cheap and clean power across all segments to sustain such growth, it is imperative to revisit some of the ‘power’ issues, so that the consumer comes out as the real winner – which is perhaps the stated objective of the Government, says Sujit Ghosh, Executive Director, BMR & Associates.



 

“Power is the mainstay for every civilisation. Possession of adequate generating capacity, efficient transmission and distribution, and affordability are the key drivers for every nation, regardless of size and population,” he adds, during the course of an e-mail interaction with Business Line, soon after the announcement of Budget 2008 proposals.

“While the Indian Government has undertaken significant steps on all these aspects, to boost the energy security of the country, there are a few areas that require attention, to achieve the ultimate goal that it has embarked upon to achieve.”

Excerpts from the interview.

What has been the direction of policy with regard to power?

Since taxes incurred by the generating companies form a significant part of the power tariff, the intention of the Government has, of late, been to ensure that via grant of fiscal incentives the cost of power is kept at levels such that affordability of power is never an issue.

In other words, the intention is to ensure that fiscal incentives are granted to power projects and these incentives are passed on to the power consumers (as much as possible) via adoption of tariff-based competitive bids etc.

Examples of incentives.

Customs and excise duty exemptions on import and manufacture of plant and machinery (respectively) form the edifice of the fiscal incentive scheme. Appended to these are the several fiscal incentives that are offered under the Foreign Trade Policy, which allows ‘deemed export’ benefits to power projects of varying capacities.

Are there gaps?

Yes. For instance, it does appear that service tax incurred during the construction of power projects (and which forms one of the significant costs for the power developers) is not exempt.

As a result, the cost of service tax (applicable at 12.36 per cent of the value of services such as engineering, construction, installation, etc.) ultimately makes its way to the power tariff, thereby making power expensive for the consumers to some extent.

Therefore, the question that begs the attention of the Government is whether exemption from service tax be not granted to mega and ultra mega power plants just as customs duty and excise duty exemptions have been granted – more so because all these taxes are levied and administered by the Central Government, which is also the nodal agency formulating the policy on power.

Any other irritants?

Another difficulty that merits consideration (for mega as well as non-mega) is that the output of the power plant does not attract excise duty; nor does it attract VAT (value added tax) or CST (Central Sales Tax). This results in trapping of input taxes (on which exemption is not available, viz. input service tax, input VAT/works contract tax etc.).

To elaborate, under a fiscal regime that is based on the concept of value added taxes, exemptions are not an acceptable concept. The reason being, where the output is exempt from tax, taxes incurred on the input cannot be set off against the output, and therefore, they remain as a system tax, to be ultimately rolled into the price paid for the services or goods procured by the consumer.

What can be an alternative?

Instead of exemption, if the output (i.e. electrical energy) were ‘zero-rated,’ much of the input taxes could have been claimed by the power companies as refund from the Government (Central Government for Central levies and State Government for State levies).

This would have led to the ultimate gain of the consumer on the basis that the power producer would have had the opportunity to factor these refunds in arriving at the power tariffs.

The concept of ‘zero rating’ is prevalent in many countries across the globe, which have adopted GST (goods and services tax) or VAT. Even in India, at the state level, sales made to EOUs (export-oriented units) and SEZ (special economic zone) have been declared as ‘zero rated’ for precisely the same reason.

Therefore, time is perhaps ripe to revisit the concept of exemptions, and then selectively move towards the concept of ‘zero rating’ till such time India does not embrace the GST system, which is proposed to be rolled in a few years from now.

On the policy relating to mega power.

An issue that requires careful consideration relating to the current Mega Power Policy in force in India is about alignment. The notifications issued by the Ministry of Finance under the customs and excise laws, and the Deemed Export Policy, need to be aligned appropriately, in terms of the language used, the specific situation that is sought to be covered, and the exceptions created.

To illustrate, while for grant of customs duty exemption, the customs notification in force provides a set of criteria, one criterion requires obtaining a certificate from the Ministry of Power stating that the project in question is a Mega Power Project. However, criteria that would govern the Ministry of Power while issuing such a certificate have not been provided for in the notification. Nor do we have, in the public domain, any policy document that clearly lays down these criteria.

Source : Hindu - Chennai, India,  dated 05/03/2008

 

Privacy Policy|Disclaimer|Advertise|Sponsor

Copyright © 2001 Sriviven Software

Site Optimized for view with IE5+ 800 * 600