|
States have not been
reluctant to accept the new regime but some of them have
reservations on some aspects and have fears about
revenue loss. They have been assured that for five years
any revenue loss will be compensated by the Centre. But
many are not willing to let go some taxes and
discretionary powers they have under the present system.
There should not be any serious dilution of the GST
regime as it has been conceived. In July it was decided
that there would be a dual taxation structure, with the
Centre and the states administering separate rates. Now
there is demand for more differential rates and
exemptions. According to the discussion paper, there may
be as many as four rates for goods — a lower rate for
essential goods, a standard rate for general goods and
special rates for certain others. A system of multiple
rates and increasing exemptions should be discouraged
because they defeat the purpose of GST and would make
implementation difficult. The plan to keep octroi and
similar local taxes outside the system is therefore not
sound from this point of view.
There is the need for a wide consensus on the new system
because it changes the entire tax regime. Consultations
are needed with the states, industry and business and
consumers organisations. But it should be ensured that
too many compromises are not made. It is also important
to expedite the development of technical support for the
implementation of the system. It seems unlikely that the
rollout will happen in April 2010 as originally planned
but efforts should be made to stick to the target date.
Source :
Deccan
Herald,
dated
17/11/2009
|