For
an effective GST regime at state level, all the indirect taxes
will be merged and there will be a single tax structure.
"How
can we ask traders and businessmen to switch to another
complicated tax regime when they have yet to accustom
themselves to the VAT system? Why does the Central government
ape demand-side economics of Western countries," asked
Raghavji, MP finance minister while speaking to Business
Standard, adding, "India has its own traditional
accounting system and all states have a lot of leeway after
the implementation of VAT. There will be pro rata increase in
prices if we impose more taxes. At least Madhya Pradesh is not
ready to adopt GST."
GST
includes service tax and states get no share of it, according
to Raghavji.
The
Central government, he says, should consider the state's
problems. The Centre still retains a lion's share of taxes on
the concurrent list. States like Madhya Pradesh face
difficulty in terms of managing the huge forest cover, but in
lieu of that it receives only a pittance — a mere 30 per
cent of what it mops up as tax; it should not be less than 50
per cent, according to Raghavji.
Madhya
Pradesh has added Rs 6,000 crore to its kitty from VAT. But
the state has reported tax evasion even after the
implementation of the tax. It had to pass a Bill in 2007 and
has switched to the tax deducted at source system instead of
VAT to check evasion, particularly in soyabean trading.
The
state government has also introduced a modified
"Write-Off" clause in the VAT system. In a number of
cases, companies have not paid taxes and have entered into
litigation after getting "sick" or
"closed" status. Soya trading firms have been
reportedly big offenders in this regard.
So