|
How the
taxpayer will be affected by GST
The release of the first discussion paper on the goods
and services tax (GST) has set the ball rolling for taxpayers to initiate action
plans towards managing this change. It would not be unreasonable to state that
the delta created by switching over to GST would be significant and needs
detailed analysis and a robust plan of action to capitalize on opportunities,
mitigate risks and deal with the change. |
|
|
While the paper
does not cover all aspects of the proposed regulations,
it provides sufficient guidelines on how the regulations
will unfold. Some of the significant aspects are the
dual model, treatment of interstate transactions, the
framework of rates, and expected uniformity in
classification and valuation.
It is reasonably clear as to which indirect taxes will
be merged into GST as of now. An immediate impact area
for businesses paying these taxes is to understand how
the tax would change—if at all—under GST. For example,
the basis of levy of excise and service tax is likely to
change. Similarly, some tax laws are now joining the
value-added tax system, which were till now neither
fully creditable nor any full credits were allowed to be
offset for payment of such taxes—namely, excise duty
under the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise
Duties) Act, entertainment tax and luxury tax. These
changes can have a considerable impact on trade and
industry ranging from how tax is levied to when it is
required to be paid to whether credits accrue for such
taxes, not to mention compliance changes.
In terms of point of levy, it has been stated that
“transactions for a consideration” would be liable to
tax. This may therefore suggest that taxes will apply
only when goods are sold or services are supplied.
However, it is currently being debated on how stock
transfers, inter-unit transfers and inter-office
services on an interstate basis should be treated.
One view is that with the withdrawal of the requirement
to issue forms evidencing veracity of a stock transfer
of goods. GST may be made applicable to such transfers
also. This changes the entire framework of how taxes are
being computed and tracked by trade and industry. There
would be a manifold increase in the number of
transactions liable to tax, requiring a robust
information technology system and trained personnel to
compute all taxable transactions, capture all resultant
credits in the recipient locations and report all such
information in both the returns—one for the sending
location and other for the receiving location.
An integrated GST (IGST) model has been proposed for
taxing of interstate supply of goods and services. This
is an interesting mechanism to ensure that interstate
transactions come into the fold of GST. It is not clear
as of now whether the model would trigger additional
compliance requirements on the taxpayer, but it is
certainly clear that there credit pool for IGST would
have to be separately maintained.
With dual GST already requiring separate credit pools
for Central GST and state GST and the paper suggesting
that the current input credit mechanism would be
replaced by a new system, trade would have to be ready
to accept credit data into its systems, track it
separately and generate accurate output to understand
what credits are available for each of the three pools,
and how they should be utilized as per the new
mechanism, which is yet to be rolled out.
For service providers, the IGST model may have
far-reaching implications. Currently, most service
providers operate under a centralized registration model
and are paying taxes for services provided pan-India at
one location. With states getting power to tax services
rendered in their states, there may be a dilution in
this concept of one registration, one tax office
concept, and compliance would get triggered in all
states where services are provided. It is also expected
that a set of rules defining place of supply of services
would be rolled out.
In summary, the discussion paper is a significant step
towards rationalizing the indirect tax framework of
India. While there is no specific commitment on this
date of implementation in the paper, it is encouraging
that some of the key issues have been ironed out. It is
now time for businesses to gear up for this change.
Sour ce
:
Livemint,
India, dated 11/11/2009
|