Q: I just want to start with the first concern which is
the proposed timeline, they have talked about April 1,
2010, they have been talking about it for a while, from
what you have seen and from your experience in other
jurisdictions does this seem to be realistic to you?
A: I believe it is important that the dateline
foresees sufficient time for the businesses and
enterprises to prepare themselves for the implementation
because an implementation of such a system has a very
wide impact on the business. It does not only impact the
accounting department, but also impacts the systems,
some legal provisions, pricing and the supply chain. So
I believe it is important that we give sufficient time
to the businesses to study the legislation, implement it
and then asses its impact on the business.
What we see in other jurisdictions is that the
usual time between the availability of the law and the
date of implementation is usually around 18 months in
order to provide sufficient time for the businesses.
Q: I think one of the concerns in India has been that
the implementation of GST will turn out to be likely
implementation of value added tax (VAT) in a certain
sense, VAT introduced in 2005 and all the states adopted
it slowly one by one and I think it was only very
recently that all the states in the country have finally
come around to the VAT system, do you think something
like that make sense for GST, do you think it makes
sense to have a piecemeal approach where each state
adopts it over an extended period of time or do you
think it has to be done in one fell through?
A: What we have in Europe is European directive which
gives a framework in order to allow member states to
translate this into national legislation and the date of
implementation and the applicability is always the same
in every member state. So I believe it makes sense to
adopt it at the same time for every member state from my
perspective.
Q: Although the white paper hasn’t said anything
about a rate yet from what we see it looks like it will
be between 16% and 20%, from your experience is that too
high because I think that has been one of the concerns?
A: In Europe and in other jurisdictions in the
world, we have wide range of rates. To give you an
understanding in Europe, there is a difference in rates
between the lowest 15% and the highest 25% which is
quite a big bracket. Also in other parts of the world,
we have rates along the lines of 20% but sometimes
higher, sometimes lower. So I believe it is up to the
government and the budgets to see what rate is most
appropriate to levy.
Q: The other thing is that certain taxes have been
kept outside the purview of the GST, I think purchase
tax has been kept out, tax on alcohol, tobacco and
petroleum, is that something that is common in other
jurisdictions to keep certain taxes out because it seems
to me to be defeating the entire purpose of GST which is
a consolidated simple tax regime with clarity across the
board?
A: We do see in other jurisdictions that certain
goods and services are kept out of the system. With
respect to the typical products that you mentioned,
alcohol, tobacco and others, in Europe, they are inside
the system. So there is VAT levied on alcohol products,
on petroleum products. So I don’t see an immediate
reason why these products need to be kept out of the
system.
Q: What might the impact be if certain taxes are
kept outside sort of the purview of GST because like I
said if the goal is to consolidate the tax regime, make
it easier and simpler for everybody, would this not give
rise to greater confusion?
A: I think it would. In my view it would be easier
if these products would just be kept into the system in
order to make the system easier to apply.
Q: From your experience and what you have seen in
the European union, what is critical for India for the
government in the states to achieve over the course of
the next few months as they move towards the GST regime,
what would make this implementation process smoother and
easier for the government, for industry and for
everybody else involved?
A: In the system we have three players. We have
the consumer that is paying the tax; we have the
government where the taxes is going to but we have the
enterprises, the businesses in the middle who are
collecting the tax. I believe it is very important that
the government gives a sufficient amount of time to the
businesses to prepare themselves in order for them to
allow to take up their important role as collector of
the tax.
What we see in other situations is that businesses
really need sufficient amount of time to prepare
themselves in order to prepare for this change. It is
important for the businesses to have sufficient good
change plan in order to assess all of the changes that
has come out of this new GST system.