India will be unable to meet its target for introduction
of the single Goods and Services tax (GST) by 1 April, after all the state
governments, excluding those of Kerala and Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), refused to
sign on and instead wished-for that the launch of a unified tax regime be
postponed to 2011.
The appointed committee of state finance ministers
asked for another meeting in the first week of January
to finalize the debatable issue of tax rates. The
finance ministers also expressed their doubts on the
proposal put forth by the 13th Finance Commission (TFC)
to have a uniform GST rate of 12%—comprising a
simultaneous levy of 5% by the Centre and 7% by the
states.
GST has been allocated as the single biggest tax reform
initiative that will economically combine the country
and do away with the existing numerous tax structures.
TFC has reckoned that the implementation of GST will
grow the economy by as much as an additional 1.5 %
points every year over and above the existing growth
rate.
Immediately after the meeting of the empowered
committee, Madhya Pradesh Finance Minister Raghavji, who
uses only one name, said: “Our demand for deferring the
implementation was supported by even Congress-ruled
states.”
The empowered committee’s Chairman, Asim Dasgupta,
Finance Minister of West Bengal, admitted that the
Central Government had been unable to bring in GST
legislation in the winter session of Parliament, which
is due to conclude on 21 December.
To implement GST, the Central Government will have to
set up a Bill looking for amendments to the
Constitution. Currently, the power to tax has been
divided between the Central and State Government.
Dasgupta added that India’s finance minister Pranab
Mukherjee “has said he is very willing to discuss (this)
with us in January after this Parliament session is
over”. He said, “After our meeting with him, we would be
able to take a decision on constitutional amendments and
other preparations.”
The empowered committee will meet again on 7 January in
New Delhi for a two-day meeting, which will also see the
evaluation of the study undertaken by the National
Institute of Public Finance and Policy on the revenue
significances of the introduction of GST for states.
Some state finance ministers, who were pushing for
deferment of the GST deadline, mentioned that industry
representatives were contrasting to the introduction of
GST mid-way through the year, a reaction to a proposal
to roll it out by June instead of 1 April, 2010.
However, representatives of industry debated otherwise
and were let down by the move to defer the
implementation of GST. “Everybody expected that it would
not be practical to implement by 1 April. Having said
that, an issue of indirect tax need not be deferred by a
year. It can happen anytime in the year; only a lead
time of three months needs to be given for us to
prepare,” said a representative of an industry lobby
group.
Vivek Mishra, Partner at audit firm Pricewaterhouse
Coopers pointed out “Based on the amount of issues to be
decided, all the elements are yet to be in place. It
will take one year only to have the design of GST in
place. It may take another two years to implement it.
Source:
Institute of International
Trade, India, dated 18/12/2009