|
The empowered committee of state finance ministers
had suggested separate thresholds for central GST and
state GST (SGST), wherein businesses below a gross
annual turnover between Rs 1.5 crore and Rs 10 lakh
would be subjected only to SGST, and not CGST.
|
TAXING ISSUE |
|
EMPOWERED PANEL PROPOSES |
|
Rs 10 lakh as
threshold for SGST and Rs 1.5 crore for CGST |
|
* Reason: Avoid
dual control and protect small businesses
interest |
|
* Implication:
Centre’s assessee base to decline, resulting
in less revenue |
|
UNION GOVERNMENT PROPOSES |
|
Rs 10 lakh as
common threshold |
|
* Reason: Avoid
accounting problems, especially in IGST |
|
* Implication:
Cost of administering of small traders to
rise |
The rationale behind the empowered
committee’s suggestion for different thresholds was to
protect the “interests of small traders and small-scale
industries, and to avoid dual control”. The government
suggested compensating small businesses with turnover
below Rs 1.5 crore by simplifying and reducing their
paperwork, instead of keeping them out of CGST.
“It (the threshold) should be Rs 10 lakh for both Centre
and states. We have suggested a simplified procedure for
threshold below Rs 1.5 crore. They may not have to file
returns frequently; registration process could be
simplified; minimum audit could be prescribed for them
based on risk parameters; and benefits under the
compounding scheme could be extended,” an official in
the finance ministry told Business Standard.
The Centre is worried that a variance in threshold limit
could change the revenue neutral rate and also lead to
problems in collecting inter-state GST (IGST), which
would be applied on inter-state transfer of goods and
services. “There is huge benefit in common threshold.
It allows more effective monitoring. A threshold of Rs
1.5 crore will create distortions between the goods at
the two sides of this level. The Rs 10 lakh cut-off is
small, but if the threshold is as high as Rs 1.5 crore,
it may lead to some companies underreporting their
annual turnover,” said Satya Poddar, partner, Ernst and
Young.
Sour ce :
Business Standard,
India,
dated
10/12/2009
|