|
GST regime
could see massive relocation of tax officials
After facing legal, technical and infrastructural
challenges in implementation of the already-delayed
Goods and Services Tax (GST), the government has been
confronted with new problems — manpower management and
dislocation of its offices under the proposed indirect
tax regime. |
|
|
A committee of the
finance ministry has found GST would require a lot of relocation of offices and
officers.
Presently, the Union government’s field officers are located in cities where
manufacturing activity is happening, whereas states do not have much to do with
manufacturing and levy of sales tax or value added tax (VAT) on the point of
trading of goods. In GST, for instance, the Centre may need to have its office
in Nagpur, which is not a manufacturing hub, but an important trading centre for
states.
“There will be dislocation of offices unless extensive computerisation is done.
More than five million traders cannot file their tax returns electronically from
the first day of GST implementation. We have to reorient our manpower. There
will be a lot of resistance from our own officers. For such a big change, we
need to plan on change resistance, otherwise it will create problems,” said a
finance ministry official.
The committee, comprising three commissioners of the finance ministry, was asked
to survey and identify the location of trading centres, study the impact of GST
on those centres, find out the places of major assessee base and the workforce
that would be shifted. The committee, set up in December 2009, co-opted more
members and conducted a pilot study in Hyderabad, Bangalore and Chennai. It gave
its preliminary findings in March. A final report is likely to be submitted in
May.
The Centre says it has the IT infrastructure in place, but it was a major issue
with states, especially in case of the inter-state GST, or IGST, which would be
collected by the Centre and passed on to the states. IGST has to be transferred
electronically. The Centre’s online tax payment applications ACES would be
tweaked a bit to take care of GST. Computerisation of states, however, is a
concern. Maharashtra, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu are even ahead of Centre, but a
large number of states do not have the infrastructure.
“The Centre is working on a project with the states to upgrade their IT
infrastructure. There is a great variation and the government will assist them
because it has to be a common platform. Unlike VAT, where implementation could
be done in parts, here all have to join at the same time,” the official said.
Source:
Business Standard, India, dated
05/04/2010
|