|
GST, an
incentive to join the organised sector!
Introduction of Goods and Services Tax (GST) and a
Direct Taxes Code (DTC) are expected to be path-breaking
steps in India’s tax reform journey. They would be
potent instruments in the move towards an economically
efficient, effective and equitable tax system. |
|
|
DTC implementation would
trigger better compliance, resulting in reduced tax incidence. However, there
are some areas of concern to the Industry: MAT on asset base, lack of clarity on
sunset clause of tax incentives, etc.
The code proposes a lower corporate tax rate, but with the abolition/dilution of
many tax holidays, the effective tax burden could be higher for some industries.
There are some other issues too. The continuation of Dividend Distribution Tax
(DDT) coupled with the proposed MAT of 2% on gross assets would increase the
overall tax liability of many companies, especially capital-intensive
industries. Even loss-making units would be saddled with a tax burden.
The stringent Anti-avoidance Rules will bring greater uncertainty.
The wide discretionary powers given to Commissioner rank officers will reduce
first level transparency and trigger avoidable litigation. This could deter
foreign investment, too.
As a destination-based tax on consumption of goods and services with an input
credit mechanism, GST must subsume all indirect taxes and bring simplicity
across the value chain. The broadening of the tax base and simplifying tax
procedures will bring in transparency and encourage investments in the organised
sector. There would be, perhaps, for the first time, an incentive to join the
organised sector!
The value chain for almost all industries will be simplified and streamlined as
a result of harmonised taxes across the nation, negligible cascading impact and
removal of inter-state tax barriers. This could yield significant dividends for
the economy in terms of increased output and productivity. This may contribute
handsomely to the national income.
Better management of supply chain across various states (fast movement of goods,
speedy disbursement of tax refund, quick assessments) will help achieve the
macro-economic goal of GST introduction—improving the GDP by 1 or 2 percentage
points.
GST will spur higher tax compliance and ultimately a lower effective tax rate.
Cross-credit mechanism and supply chain consolidation will help eliminate
non-value adding structures and reduce costs. For example, the companies
presently deploy the C&F / depot mechanism in most states to avoid the CST levy.
GST will reduce logistics costs and enable industry players to reduce
prices—that will in turn spur consumption.
All indirect taxes should be subsumed under GST- There should be no indirect tax
left outside the purview of GST.
The GST legislation should be as simple as possible, with a single rate at least
for CGST. Classification of goods and services should follow the HSN system, so
that there are no fresh interpretation issues. The entire system should move
with speed- classification, levy, collection and refunds all should move fast.
Doubts about ability of any State Government to make GST refunds should be
covered by Central Government through suitable assurances.
GST exemptions should not be arbitrary. There should be few simple ground rules,
such as relevance to common man, inflation potency and collection efficiency.
Items of daily necessity for the common man such as food grains, sugar, edible
oils etc are “sensitive” items. They can generate emotive issues. They command a
high proportion of price indices and have a high “inflation-potency”.
Cost of collecting tax should not be high. Net tax collected should be high
enough. Exemptions should continue where the value per transaction is low and
the cost of levying GST is high—for instance, commodities like food grains or
edible oils. While GST could be a great macro economic step, it will need very
efficient execution. For this, grass-root level official machinery should be
educated and on this the industry can also play a part.
Source:
Financial Express, India, dated
05/02/2010
|